![]() |
| 3001-3330 W. Granville, 1956. |
Chicago social media has had some interesting discussion recently about how residents perceive their neighborhood and how that shapes their response to new development. I was inspired by an online article by Daniel Kay Hertz, "How Bungalow-y is the Bungalow Belt?" Unfortunately, it's no longer available online. But to summarize, if you live on a block of predominantly single-family homes, it's easy to overlook scattered multi-family buildings, which easily outnumber single-family homes in terms of unit count. So, when new multi-family housing is proposed, a comparatively small proportion of neighborhood residents see it as uncharacteristic, guided more by their intuitive understanding of the area than by actual demographics.
![]() |
| 2250 Single-Family Homes and 946 Multi-Family Homes (1945-1965) |
So I thought it might be interesting to look at multi-family housing in the West Ridge neighborhood. In particular, I'm focusing on mid-century development, which housing advocates and architectural historians often overlook. What exactly are the proportions of multi-family buildings to single-family buildings during this period? How did development change over time? To answer some of these questions, I used the Building Footprints data provided by the City of Chicago. This is the information the city uses in its Geographic Information System, and includes construction date, unit counts, and number of floors. Full disclosure-- I have no idea if this information is accurate. I assume much of it was taken from the Cook County Tax Assessor. But it was the best building-level information I could identify, so I'm going with it.
Between 1945 and 1965 there were 2550 single family homes constructed in West Ridge. Not surprising, since much of the neighborhood participated in the post-war building boom. In the same time period there were 946 multi-family homes built. In comparison the total number of single-family households remain at 2550, but the multi-family buildings contain 4653 households-- nearly twice as many. (My crummy graphs are meant to represent this visually, although you'll have to click on them before they become legible.) So, the real weight of opinion in the neighborhood should really be with the residents of the multi-family buildings.
In the next few weeks I'll be taking a closer look at some of these mid-century multi-family buildings. I find this era to be a very creative period in housing history, and one that hasn't really received enough attention from a developmental or architectural standpoint. The West Ridge neighborhood is practically an encyclopedia of mid-century design, and I hope to plot out a small part of it.
I also want to talk a bit about what's becoming known as the "missing middle" of the housing market- developments which are similar in scale to single family homes but create a denser neighborhood, permitting greater diversity, walkability and affordability. I believe these mid-century buildings are good examples and can provide some lessons on adding density in established urban neighborhoods.
![]() | |
| 2250 Single Family Units and 4653 Multi Family Units |
In the next few weeks I'll be taking a closer look at some of these mid-century multi-family buildings. I find this era to be a very creative period in housing history, and one that hasn't really received enough attention from a developmental or architectural standpoint. The West Ridge neighborhood is practically an encyclopedia of mid-century design, and I hope to plot out a small part of it.
I also want to talk a bit about what's becoming known as the "missing middle" of the housing market- developments which are similar in scale to single family homes but create a denser neighborhood, permitting greater diversity, walkability and affordability. I believe these mid-century buildings are good examples and can provide some lessons on adding density in established urban neighborhoods.
![]() |
| 6158 N. Richmond, 1959 |



